Originally posted by francis8 at 2007-2-2 08:10:
各位C 兄, 有冇人知佢重光未呀?![]()
Originally posted by 天下 at 2007-2-2 12:03:
冒死試河豚,明天去博一掙博。![]()
Originally posted by chinabb169 at 2007-2-3 00:39:
why no photo ge ???![]()
Originally posted by johnvivian at 2007-2-3 00:23:
己經開左, 1Feb, 我有個囡囡講的.
Originally posted by pantsu at 2007-2-3 03:13:
唔賣廣告咪冇得睇囉![]()
Originally posted by 骨總 at 2007-2-3 09:16:
或者唔志在我地班兄弟既銀紙.![]()
Originally posted by 骨總 at 2007-2-2 11:06:
雖然開o左但仍然冇信心 , 暫時唔會去住.
Originally posted by chevalier at 3-2-2007 23:00:
開張了,今日剛去完地方格色和以前沒有大分別可能是同一苮老細關係,浴室都寬敞,入到房間感覺唔錯,囡囡質素,制服和服務都好,個地方有兩個費用第一個是鍮式188,第二個是半套300,有時間不仿去一去
Originally posted by 夜鬼 at 2007-2-4 07:35:
新開番貨辦未知如何,相又冇得睇唔吊佢四婆
Originally posted by pps06851213 at 2007-2-6 08:56:
新裝修, 感覺好左 rmb188.-,
以前10送1仲有亦可用, 放心
Originally posted by hongonryu at 2007-2-6 11:14:
woo.... all negative feedback wor. is %* still there???
=============
居然贵o左 廿蚊,太过份,话o左唔夾錢裝修 ga ma !
Originally posted by wing123 at 2007-2-6 11:55:
真係咁差?劣評如潮wo~
$188係貴左d~不過有相好係入面..........真係麻煩了~
![]()
Originally posted by 大袋淫魔2005 at 2007-2-7 10:20:
咁既服務就算新裝修完唔駛幾耐好快會執.
Originally posted by chinabb169 at 2007-2-6 11:58 PM:
轉貼別網
發表於 2007-2-6 11:39 AM bb38
尋晚去完抱撼而回,大廳冇人理我,好似我冇錢比咁樣,坐低要週圍揾人乞杯野飲,冇人問我想要咩女,冇幾耐職 ...
Originally posted by chinabb169 at 2007-2-6 23:58:
轉貼別網
發表於 2007-2-6 11:39 AM bb38
尋晚去完抱撼而回,大廳冇人理我,好似我冇錢比咁樣,坐低要週圍揾人乞杯野飲,冇人問我想要咩女,冇幾耐職 ...
Originally posted by 烈火 at 8-2-07 17:59:
我相信,因為有一次,個囡囡完全唔可以給我摸,上下都要格手又要擋!在失望的情況下推不到,冇意思走人,總收我¥188!因為要扮矜貴,可以搵倒錢.![]()
Originally posted by 烈火 at 2007-2-8 17:59:
我相信,因為有一次,個囡囡完全唔可以給我摸,上下都要格手又要擋!在失望的情況下推不到,冇意思走人,總收我¥188!因為要扮矜貴,可以搵倒錢.![]()
Originally posted by ace at 2007-2-9 23:55:
下次烈火兄咁唔好彩遇到服務咁差嘅囡囡, 應該第一時間出個report black list 呢種囡囡
, 避免桑拿街兄弟中招
![]()
Originally posted by 我係廚房仔 at 2007-2-10 09:19:
有c兄講過話尼個場好似唔志在桑拿街既兄弟幫櫬wor
Originally posted by chinabb169 at 2007-2-10 18:26:
fully support !!!![]()
Originally posted by 尼路 at 2007-2-9 06:23 PM:
記得深麗晌主頁曾有廣告
如今深濠卻冇
想睇版先都冇
失望
Originally posted by tsang123 at 2007-2-18 01:19 AM:
I just found out that 深濠 has advertisments here in the front page
写得几长细 wor,等我改頭改尾再 post 去其它 site 先,你放心啦,我係唔會引用出處的,
我會當原創的!
話時話,條 good ser bg 老 num 幾多號呀,點解唔 post 出泥呀!唔該!
Originally posted by joeycheung23 at 2007-2-20 20:46:
本來想開個新帖,相信以后小弟都會少d係尼處留言!小弟–直從舊街到現在,幾近每日都上來走走,近來忽然覺得個網變曬質,覺得尼處好多(寫手)文章。因為本留言版糸一個(商業)桑拿網所支持,感覺上有d版主未申報利 ...
Originally posted by people at 2007-2-20 22:16:
我都同意 呢個網真係變左質了
Originally posted by joeycheung23 at 2007-2-20 08:46 PM:
本來想開個新帖,相信以后小弟都會少d係尼處留言!小弟–直從舊街到現在,幾近每日都上來走走,近來忽然覺得個網變曬質,覺得尼處好多(寫手)文章。因為本留言版糸一個(商業)桑拿網所支持,感覺上有d版主未申報利 ...
Originally posted by screwdriver at 2007-2-20 22:22:
同.....意.....之.....至!
Originally posted by joeycheung23 at 2007-2-20 20:46:
本來想開個新帖,相信以后小弟都會少d係尼處留言!小弟–直從舊街到現在,幾近每日都上來走走,近來忽然覺得個網變曬質,覺得尼處好多(寫手)文章。因為本留言版糸一個(商業)桑拿網所支持,感覺上有d版主未申報利 ...
Originally posted by 夜鬼 at 2007-2-21 05:57:
既然所有版主並非職員,有何申報利益可言奇怪,好老實任何論壇不論係唔係商業性質都好難避免冇寫手鱔稿存在,始終有尼類人食尼類飯,甚至乎骨場職員充當網友出經歷報告tim,反而我覺得桑拿街算 ...
Originally posted by joeycheung23 at 2007-2-21 18:55:
本來不想再留言,(但我絕對支持之前想法),多謝有師兄支持小弟意見!其實還有很多問題,筆力所限作罷!有師兄PM小弟取當日女女號碼請算小弟自私,暫不想告知。robertchan兄 版主中小弟一直最喜歡兄弟你留言(風趣 ...
歡迎光臨 桑拿街論壇 (http://sauna-88.com/forum/) | Powered by Discuz! 6.0.0 |